Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Strategic Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Strategic Engineering Group holds $42.7M in lifetime obligations with a 77.5% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Strategic Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $42.7M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
•Strategic Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 77.5%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Strategic Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Army
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Strategic Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$42.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$18.8M
Recompete Win Rate:77.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:27
Average Award Cycle:48 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):336611
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512