Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Strategic Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Strategic Engineering Group holds $6.0M in lifetime obligations with a 87.3% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Strategic Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $6.0M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Strategic Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 87.3%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Strategic Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Strategic Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$6.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$1.4M
Recompete Win Rate:87.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:8
Average Award Cycle:44 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):336992
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512