Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Strategic Global Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Global Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Strategic Global Services holds $28.1M in lifetime obligations with a 88.9% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Strategic Global Services Lifetime Spend: $28.1M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Strategic Global Services Recompete Win %: 88.9%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Strategic Global Services Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Strategic Global Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$28.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.7M
Recompete Win Rate:88.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:16
Average Award Cycle:44 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):332994
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Strategic Global Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence