Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Strategic Scientific Corp vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Scientific Corp and THE BOEING COMPANY: Strategic Scientific Corp holds $47.1M in lifetime obligations with a 73.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Strategic Scientific Corp Lifetime Spend: $47.1M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Strategic Scientific Corp Recompete Win %: 73.2%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Strategic Scientific Corp Top Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Strategic Scientific Corp

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$47.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$11.6M
Recompete Win Rate:73.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:43 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541714
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Strategic Scientific Corp
UEI: R5TYM4ZYTK2F • Washington, ME
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA