Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Summit Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Summit Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Summit Consulting Group holds $45.0M in lifetime obligations with a 90.9% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Summit Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $45.0M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Summit Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 90.9%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Summit Consulting Group Top Agency: General Services Administration
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Summit Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$45.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$11.4M
Recompete Win Rate:90.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:9
Average Award Cycle:50 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541620
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Summit Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence