Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Summit Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Summit Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Summit Engineering Group holds $9.6M in lifetime obligations with a 75.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Summit Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $9.6M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Summit Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 75.6%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Summit Engineering Group Top Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Summit Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$9.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$3.8M
Recompete Win Rate:75.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:11
Average Award Cycle:46 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):488190
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512