Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Summit Scientific Corp vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Summit Scientific Corp and THE BOEING COMPANY: Summit Scientific Corp holds $28.2M in lifetime obligations with a 82.3% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Summit Scientific Corp Lifetime Spend: $28.2M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Summit Scientific Corp Recompete Win %: 82.3%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Summit Scientific Corp Top Agency: General Services Administration
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Summit Scientific Corp

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$28.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$12.1M
Recompete Win Rate:82.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:22
Average Award Cycle:47 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334519
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Summit Scientific Corp
UEI: PSQ2HKDPWN5G • Washington, WV
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA