Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Tactical Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Tactical Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Tactical Applied Sciences holds $25.3M in lifetime obligations with a 76.1% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Tactical Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $25.3M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Tactical Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 76.1%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Tactical Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Navy
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Tactical Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$25.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.1M
Recompete Win Rate:76.1%
Active Prime Task Orders:15
Average Award Cycle:56 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561110
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Tactical Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence