Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Tactical Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Tactical Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Tactical Consulting Group holds $44.1M in lifetime obligations with a 80.5% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Tactical Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $44.1M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Tactical Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 80.5%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Tactical Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Tactical Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$44.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$11.0M
Recompete Win Rate:80.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:20
Average Award Cycle:52 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):518210
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Tactical Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence