Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Tactical Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Tactical Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Tactical Consulting Group holds $41.9M in lifetime obligations with a 72.8% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Tactical Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $41.9M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Tactical Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 72.8%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Tactical Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Army

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Tactical Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$41.9M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$12.0M

Recompete Win Rate:72.8%

Active Prime Task Orders:23

Average Award Cycle:35 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):517311

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512