Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Tactical Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Tactical Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Tactical Consulting Group holds $29.9M in lifetime obligations with a 87.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Tactical Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $29.9M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Tactical Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 87.6%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Tactical Consulting Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Tactical Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$29.9M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$12.8M
Recompete Win Rate:87.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:24
Average Award Cycle:33 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561612
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Tactical Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence