Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Tactical Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Tactical Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Tactical Consulting Group holds $29.9M in lifetime obligations with a 87.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Tactical Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $29.9M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Tactical Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 87.6%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Tactical Consulting Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Tactical Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$29.9M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$12.8M
Recompete Win Rate:87.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:24
Average Award Cycle:33 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561612
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Tactical Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence