Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Tactical Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Tactical Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Tactical Consulting Group holds $43.3M in lifetime obligations with a 78.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Tactical Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $43.3M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Tactical Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 78.0%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Tactical Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Navy
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Tactical Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$43.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.7M
Recompete Win Rate:78.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:20
Average Award Cycle:37 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):339113
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Tactical Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence