Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Tactical Global Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Tactical Global Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Tactical Global Services holds $45.7M in lifetime obligations with a 88.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Tactical Global Services Lifetime Spend: $45.7M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Tactical Global Services Recompete Win %: 88.6%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Tactical Global Services Top Agency: General Services Administration
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Tactical Global Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$45.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$15.8M
Recompete Win Rate:88.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:7
Average Award Cycle:59 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541611
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Tactical Global Services
UEI: LJEUDDW376KD • Washington, WA
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA