Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Tactical Global Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Tactical Global Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Tactical Global Services holds $45.7M in lifetime obligations with a 88.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Tactical Global Services Lifetime Spend: $45.7M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Tactical Global Services Recompete Win %: 88.6%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Tactical Global Services Top Agency: General Services Administration
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Tactical Global Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$45.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$15.8M
Recompete Win Rate:88.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:7
Average Award Cycle:59 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541611
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Tactical Global Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence