Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

TCOM, L.P. vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between TCOM, L.P. and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: TCOM, L.P. holds $1.31B in lifetime obligations with a 81.1% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•TCOM, L.P. Lifetime Spend: $1.31B
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•TCOM, L.P. Recompete Win %: 81.1%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•TCOM, L.P. Top Agency: Department of Defense
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

TCOM, L.P.

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.31B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$458.1M
Recompete Win Rate:81.1%
Active Prime Task Orders:3
Average Award Cycle:58 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541330
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
TCOM, L.P.
UEI: HEZDP5MN11A3 • Washington, MD
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX