Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Titan Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Titan Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Titan Applied Sciences holds $359.0M in lifetime obligations with a 96.0% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Titan Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $359.0M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Titan Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 96.0%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Titan Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Army
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Titan Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$359.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$92.7M
Recompete Win Rate:96.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:184
Average Award Cycle:49 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561612
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Titan Applied Sciences
UEI: V60LRNDP3C8P • Washington, AZ
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX