Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Titan Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Titan Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Titan Applied Sciences holds $359.0M in lifetime obligations with a 96.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Titan Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $359.0M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Titan Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 96.0%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Titan Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Army
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Titan Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$359.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$92.7M
Recompete Win Rate:96.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:184
Average Award Cycle:49 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561612
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Titan Applied Sciences
UEI: V60LRNDP3C8P • Washington, AZ
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA