Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Titan Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Titan Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Titan Applied Sciences holds $865.7M in lifetime obligations with a 72.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Titan Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $865.7M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Titan Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 72.6%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Titan Applied Sciences Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Titan Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$865.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$211.7M
Recompete Win Rate:72.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:51
Average Award Cycle:35 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561210
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Titan Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence