Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Titan Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Titan Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Titan Consulting Group holds $13.1M in lifetime obligations with a 73.8% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

Titan Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $13.1M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
Titan Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 73.8%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
Titan Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Titan Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$13.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$4.0M
Recompete Win Rate:73.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:13
Average Award Cycle:47 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334220
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Titan Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence