Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Titan Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Titan Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Titan Consulting Group holds $1.07B in lifetime obligations with a 75.4% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Titan Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $1.07B

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Titan Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 75.4%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Titan Consulting Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Titan Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.07B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$267.2M

Recompete Win Rate:75.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:34

Average Award Cycle:59 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):339113

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512