Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Titan Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Titan Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Titan Consulting Group holds $744.6M in lifetime obligations with a 87.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Titan Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $744.6M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Titan Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 87.6%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Titan Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Defense

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Titan Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$744.6M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$152.7M

Recompete Win Rate:87.6%

Active Prime Task Orders:164

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541715

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512