Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Titan Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Titan Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Titan Consulting Group holds $744.6M in lifetime obligations with a 87.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•Titan Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $744.6M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Titan Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 87.6%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Titan Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Defense
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Titan Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$744.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$152.7M
Recompete Win Rate:87.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:164
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541715
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512