Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Titan Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Titan Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Titan Consulting Group holds $26.1M in lifetime obligations with a 88.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.
•Titan Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $26.1M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
•Titan Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 88.7%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
•Titan Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Air Force
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Titan Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$26.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.6M
Recompete Win Rate:88.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:26
Average Award Cycle:37 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541511
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512