Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Titan Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Titan Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Titan Engineering Group holds $39.1M in lifetime obligations with a 75.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Titan Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $39.1M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Titan Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 75.6%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Titan Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Defense

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Titan Engineering Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$39.1M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.1M

Recompete Win Rate:75.6%

Active Prime Task Orders:5

Average Award Cycle:33 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):561612

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512