Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Trident Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Trident Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Trident Consulting Group holds $28.4M in lifetime obligations with a 83.3% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Trident Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $28.4M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Trident Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 83.3%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Trident Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Trident Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$28.4M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$11.2M

Recompete Win Rate:83.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:15

Average Award Cycle:33 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541519

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512