Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Trident Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Trident Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Trident Consulting Group holds $35.4M in lifetime obligations with a 91.2% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•Trident Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $35.4M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B

•Trident Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 91.2%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%

•Trident Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Trident Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$35.4M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$15.9M

Recompete Win Rate:91.2%

Active Prime Task Orders:27

Average Award Cycle:54 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):332994

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B

Recompete Win Rate:93.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:78

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512