Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Trident Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Trident Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Trident Consulting Group holds $35.4M in lifetime obligations with a 91.2% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•Trident Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $35.4M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Trident Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 91.2%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Trident Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Trident Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$35.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$15.9M
Recompete Win Rate:91.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:27
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):332994
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512