Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Trident Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Trident Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Trident Engineering Group holds $42.6M in lifetime obligations with a 81.9% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Trident Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $42.6M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Trident Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 81.9%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Trident Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Trident Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$42.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$18.7M
Recompete Win Rate:81.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:19
Average Award Cycle:52 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561320
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Trident Engineering Group
UEI: 6GSV6X8H8MG1 • Washington, MA
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA