Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Valor Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Valor Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Valor Engineering Group holds $322.6M in lifetime obligations with a 78.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Valor Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $322.6M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Valor Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 78.2%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Valor Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Valor Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$322.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$93.5M
Recompete Win Rate:78.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:25
Average Award Cycle:48 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):236220
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Valor Engineering Group
UEI: GWWHUWT4B564 • Washington, NY
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA