Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
WINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between WINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: WINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT holds $68.7M in lifetime obligations with a 88.2% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $154.66B with a 93.3% retention rate.
•WINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT Lifetime Spend: $68.7M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $154.66B
•WINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT Recompete Win %: 88.2%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
•WINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT Top Agency: Agency for International Development
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →WINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
Total Lifetime Obligations:$68.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$24.1M
Recompete Win Rate:88.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:3
Average Award Cycle:44 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541690
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Total Lifetime Obligations:$154.66B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$54.13B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512