Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
WINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between WINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT and THE BOEING COMPANY: WINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT holds $68.7M in lifetime obligations with a 88.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•WINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT Lifetime Spend: $68.7M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•WINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT Recompete Win %: 88.2%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•WINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT Top Agency: Agency for International Development
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →WINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
Total Lifetime Obligations:$68.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$24.1M
Recompete Win Rate:88.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:3
Average Award Cycle:44 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541690
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512